|
Preakness Stakes thread
|
|
05-19-2012, 11:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Preakness Stakes thread
Who does everybody have?
So far, I've eliminated horses 9, 10 & 11. On Twitter: @beyondthebets |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 12:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
This race is all chalk. I basically played exactas, trifectas and superfectas with the combo of 9,7,5 and 6. I threw it some tickets with 4 and 2 and placed small win bets for both. I don't even know if providing my analysis is worth it because this race has probably 4 solid contenders (9,7,5, and 6 imo) but really hard to say which one wins. And I think 1, 3, 10 and 11 have virtually no shot to compete in this race.
Twitter:@JSpauny |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 12:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
Why'd you eliminate the 9?
|
|||
|
05-19-2012, 12:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
Probably because only two horses since 1925 have ever won out of the 9th post position.
|
|||
|
05-19-2012, 12:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
I included the 9 in a couple trifectas. Have it winning in one, just in case.
|
|||
|
05-19-2012, 02:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
I took Zetterholm (+2500), Daddy Nose Best (+1600), and Teeth of the Dog (+2000) to win.
Then I have (7)(8) forecast and a (6)(7)(4) tricast -- I really don't even know what that means. GOOD LUCK! |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 02:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
(05-19-2012 02:24 PM)spanishredeye Wrote: I took Zetterholm (+2500), Daddy Nose Best (+1600), and Teeth of the Dog (+2000) to win. -- not sure what the 'cast' part means. I've heard triFECTA and superFECTA. Maybe that's a fancy term for those horses boxed? No clue.
|
|||
|
05-19-2012, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
(05-19-2012 02:24 PM)spanishredeye Wrote: I took Zetterholm (+2500), Daddy Nose Best (+1600), and Teeth of the Dog (+2000) to win. Horse racing in a nutshell for me right there.
|
|||
|
05-19-2012, 02:50 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
I've eliminated the 1, 2 and 3 horses.
On Twitter: @beyondthebets |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
Can't believe there is a triple crown shot. Awesome. And I hit the exacta and trifecta. Missed the super by a hair. Had a 9/7/6/5 ticket and a 9/6/7/4 ticket.
Twitter:@JSpauny |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 05:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
Apologies for site crashing. Hopefully won't have too many outages going forward.
Blame Google searchers. On Twitter: @beyondthebets |
|||
|
05-19-2012, 07:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
I was going to post a matchup that was easy money.. Posted on other forums but this place I couldnt get into too..
I was on creative cause -120 over the day went well.. It was a huge bet for me as the line was off by at least 40c's.. horse matchups are usually a good wager.. |
|||
|
05-20-2012, 01:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
My girl hit the superfecta... unreal. Never living that down.
![]() twitter @VincentValour |
|||
|
05-20-2012, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
RE: Preakness Stakes thread
This race blew from a betting standpoint, and so did the days races. Pick 3 paid 24.60, double paid 45, exacta 18, and tri 70. Yawn.
Nice hit on the super! |
|||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Search
Member List
Calendar
Help






![[Image: butler.png]](http://www.beyondthebets.com/images/mysteryticket/butler.png)

-- not sure what the 'cast' part means. I've heard triFECTA and superFECTA. Maybe that's a fancy term for those horses boxed? No clue.
![[Image: kansas.png]](http://www.beyondthebets.com/images/mysteryticket/kansas.png)

![[Image: spfield.png]](http://www.beyondthebets.com/images/mysteryticket/spfield.png)
